The archipelago of Svalbard (formerly Spitsbergen) is roughly halfway between continental Norway and the North Pole. Norway's sovereignty was internationally recognized in the Svalbard treaty in 1920. Whilst Svalbard is sovereign Norwegian territory and Norwegian law generally applies, the 1920 treaty assures equal rights of access and commercial activities to all the 46 signatories. Only Norway and Russia take full advantage of their commercial rights and operate coal mines on the main island, which is also home to various research facilities. The two main settlements are the capital Longyearbyen and Barentsburg, where the island’s Russian and Ukrainian populations live. The main activities on Svalbard are mining, tourism and environmental research (Norway, Poland, China, Italy and India conduct research there).
The Svalbard Treaty regulates the demilitarized and visa-free status of the territory. Article 9 requires Norway to prevent the construction of naval bases and fortifications in the archipelago and the use of the islands for military purposes. The Norwegian military presence is restricted to coast guard assets. Residents may carry registered firearms to ward off polar bears, but loaded weapons are prohibited inside settlement areas.
Recently, Norway and Russia have quarreled over oil exploration rights around Svalbard. The main contention is that Russia believes Svalbard has its own shelf and exploration should be covered by the Treaty. Norway though considers Svalbard part of Norway’s mainland continental shelf and should be governed by the 1958 Continental Shelf Convention. Recently all states in the Arctic region have become increasingly concerned about sovereignty issues and access to potential mineral resources as the ice sheets retreat.
As representatives of your ministries, your role is to assess the crisis in the area under your specific sphere of interest, identify potential gray-zone threats or possible Russian hybrid tactics related to the most recent tensions. You should carefully assess risks and vulnerabilities to such threats. Moreover, discuss resources to either prevent or mitigate threats, including strategies to deter or counter specific Russian tactics. Consider preventive measures that could be applied either in the short or long-term, and their possible consequences. Additionally, you should recommend actions from your sphere that can be part of an integrated/multi domain Norwegian response to Russian provocations in this crisis. Finally, develop a unified strategy and possible countermeasures.
Instructions
You are a member of a Norwegian inter-ministerial crisis action team tasked with providing strategic and crisis management analysis and recommendations to Norwegian government leadership. As the Svalbard crisis develops, you will need to carefully weigh the risks involved before recommending courses of action. You will need to evaluate the situation as it develops, identify threats, identify viable options to mitigate/deter the threats or consequences of Russian actions and consider appropriate responses according to the role you have been assigned. Think about the effects of using these different tools of statecraft to create effective and coherent policy recommendations.
The team consists of representatives of the following sectors:
Tasks:
For the ministry expert groups:
For the interministerial crisis committee: